Timber Risk Score: 21 / 100 in 2017. The Timber Legality Risk Assessment contains an evaluation of the risk of illegality in India for five categories and 21 sub-categories of law. We found:
- Specified risk for 15 sub-categories.
- Low risk for 4 sub-categories.
- No legal requirements for 3 sub-categories.
This page provides an overview of the legality risks related to timber produced in India.
India has around 70 million hectares of forests, which covers 24% of the country. Around 15.7 million hectares are primary forest, 43 million hectares of otherwise naturally regenerated forest, and around 12 million hectares are planted forest. The total forest area is increasing by around 1 million hectares a year.
About 85% of the forest area is publicly owned, and 15% privately owned (FAO, 2015). Most of the public forests are administered by the government, and some of them by communities and indigenous groups.
India produced almost 50 million m3 of logs in 2014, of which only a small proportion was exported. The export value of primary timber products exceeded USD 80 million (ITTO, 2015).
Illegal logging and trade of high-value timber is a major problem in many parts of the country. In 2009. the Ministry of Environment and Forests estimated that 2 million m3 of logs were illegally felled per year. Several legality risks are present in India, relating to legal rights to harvest, taxes and fees, timber harvesting activities, third parties' rights, and trade and transport.
As India is one of the world’s largest importers of wood-based products, it is also a major consumer of illegal timber. The volume of illegal imports has increased, and in 2012 almost 20% of timber imports were estimated to be illegal. There has been limited acknowledgement of the problem within the country, and little response from the government (Chatham House, 2014). Companies sourcing timber from India should take care to ensure the risks identified are not present in their supply chains, or have been sufficiently mitigated.
All CITES-listed species (appendices I, II and III) from natural forests are banned from being exported for commercial purposes. Cultivated species in Appendices I and II are permitted to be exported
With continued violence in Kashmir and a heightened threat of terrorist activity by Pakistan-based militant groups, tensions and concerns over a serious military confrontation between nuclear-armed neighbors India and Pakistan remain high (Global Conflict Tracker).
According to the Uppsala Conflict Data Program there were 8 598 deaths from 2010-2019.
CITES appendix II: Aquilaria malaccensis, Aquilaria khasiana, Gonystylus macrophyllus, Pterocarpus santalinus, Rauvolfia serpentina, Dalbergia spp.
FSC Certified Forest Area: 516,128 hectares (4 December 2019).
Information Gathering
Timber sources
- Find out the different sources of legal timber
- Determine which source type your timber comes from
Timber source type | Description of source type |
---|---|
Government Reserved Forests / Unclassed Forests |
Timber from Government Reserved Forests / Unclassed Forests (can be natural forests, plantations, degraded areas or barren land. They are managed either solely by the State Forest Department or jointly by the State Forest Department and local communities through Joint Forest Management Committees (JFMCs). They may only be harvested by the Forest Department. The following documents are required:
|
Private plantations |
Timber from private plantations, including block plantations, agroforestry plantations or farm forestry plantations, industrial plantations etc. The following documents are required:
|
Risk Assessment
Risk assessment summary
Legal rights to harvest
|
|
Taxes and fees![]() |
|
Timber harvesting activities
|
|
Third parties' rights
|
|
Trade and transport![]() |
|
Specified risk species
Common/trade name | Scientific name | Risk information |
---|---|---|
Agarwood |
Aquilaria malaccensis |
CITES-listed |
Agarwood |
Aquilaria khasiana |
CITES-listed |
Ebony |
Diospyros ferrea |
CITES-listed |
Ramin |
Gonystylus macrophyllus |
CITES-listed |
Red sandalwood | Pterocarpus santalinus | CITES-listed |
Chinese yew |
Taxus chinensis |
CITES-listed |
Yew | Taxus fuana | CITES-listed |
Himalayan yew | Taxus wallichiana | CITES-listed |
Risk Mitigation
Mitigate the risks in your supply chain
Learn which actions we recommended to mitigate the risks associated with the timber sources from India
Source Certified Materials
NEPCon believes that third party certification (for example FSC and PEFC certification) can provide strong assurances of the legality of the products they cover. Companies seeking to mitigate the risks of sourcing illegal timber should seek to purchase third party certified materials wherever possible.
While the European Timber Regulation does not include an automatic “green lane” for certified products, it does recognise the value of certification as a tool for risk assessment and mitigation. The European Commission says that companies “may rate credibly certified products as having negligible risk of being illegal, i.e. suitable for placing on the market with no further risk mitigation measures, provided that the rest of the information gathered and the replies to the risk assessment questions do not contradict such a conclusion.”
For more information on using certified materials in your due diligence, including how to assess whether a certification system meets EUTR requirements, see the page on Certification and Due Diligence.
Mitigation recommendations
There are five recommended actions to mitigate the risks associated with the timber sources from India.
1. Fully map your supply chain
- Our supply chain mapping tool can help you do this.
2. Obtain and verify documents
- Land tenure documents
- Land records and ownership documents
- Records of rights to government forests as provided to private persons
- Public notifications showing government ownership of forests
- Harvesting permission
- Harvesting permits, auction documents, allotment letters and payment records
- Forest Division Working Plans (for Government forests)
- Harvest permits issued by the Forest Department (for specific agroforestry species)
- Government orders showing species that have been exempted from harvest permits (for agroforestry sources)
- Tax related documents
- Receipts for payments of harvesting-related royalties, taxes, harvesting fees and other charges. Check that volumes, species and qualities given in sales and transport documents match the fees paid
- APMC receipts from Mandi Samities. Check they correspond to the harvested material where applicable (agroforestry products)
- Sales documents, including applicable sales taxes. Check that sales prices are in line with market prices
- Receipts for payment sales taxes. Check that taxes paid are in line with the relevant VAT schedule of classification of goods and applicable VAT rates
- Records of VAT paid and filed with the sales tax authorities
- Permanent Account Number (PAN). Check that it is valid
- Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number (TAN). Check that it is valid
- Income tax records as submitted to the tax authorities
- Harvesting regulations
- Purchase documents. These can provide evidence that wood was not sourced from protected areas
- Permission letters as required by State harvesting rules (for protected species)
- Records for compliance with provisions as per the Plantation Labor Act, 1951
- Trade and transport documents
- Required trade permits. Check they exist and are documented
- Required transport documents. Check they exist and are documented
- Check that volume, species and qualities are classified according to legal requirements
- Check that documents related to transportation, trade or export are clearly linked to the specific material in question
- Vehicle commercial license. Check that it is in place
- Excise forms and other such legal documentation. Check that it is in place
- Export, import and re-export certificates issued by the Director General Foreign Trade (for all cross-border trade of CITES-listed species)
- Legal receipts. Check that the species and quantity transported are documented
3. Consult stakeholders
- Authorities confirm the validity of harvesting permit
- Financial authorities confirm that all required income and profit taxes have been paid
- Authorities confirm that operations are up-to-date regarding payment of applicable sales taxes
- Customary land owners confirm that:
- Customary rights are observed during harvesting activities
- Prior and informed consent has been given, where applicable
- Indigenous peoples’ rights are not being violated
4. Carry out on-site verification
- Confirm that harvesting takes place within the limits specified in the harvesting permit
- Confirm that the information regarding area, species, volumes and other details given in the harvesting permit are correct and within the limits prescribed in the legislation
- Confirm that Working Plan recommendations have been implemented (in the case of government forests)
5. Conduct targeted timber testing
- Conduct timber testing on samples of purchasd material to verify the species or origin of timber, where appropriate